Interconnect

Service with a smile

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

He was born poor in 1810, his father a labourer in Meaux-en-Brie. After a desultory education which ended at the age of 11, he left for Paris to find work as a cook’s apprentice. Paris at that time was a wonderful place for cooking; chefs were making their reputations in the newly invented restaurants, then uniquely Parisian institutions, where customers could for the first time choose their own meals from a varied menu. In 1831 Soyer followed some of his fellow cooks to London and the kitchens of the British aristocracy. He first became widely known as the chef at the Reform Club, his fame as much a result of assiduous self-publicity as of his fine cooking. Throughout his life he never missed an opportunity to flatter aristocratic patrons or court the press.

The first problem for his biographer is that although he was brilliant and his life was fascinating, Soyer wrote with difficulty, labouring even over his signature. He had to employ secretaries, in whom he was unlikely to confide his secret thoughts. Ruth Brandon has sifted through a great variety of writings put out in Soyer’s name which vary greatly in tone. The account of his time in the Crimea, for example, Soyer’s Culinary Campaign (1857), is well written, but his first biography, Memoirs of Alexis Soyer (1859), written by a former secretary just after Soyer’s death, is full of half-believable embroidered anecdotes.

Soyer’s huge, almost Balzacian personality, with all his energy, flamboyance, quick wit, generosity, sentimentality, social insecurity, kindness and sheer good humour, shines through Brandon’s book, but she does not attempt to place him in the history of cooking, in the context of the work of his contemporary chefs. She assesses his culinary gifts herself by cooking and commenting (with irritating personal asides) on one of his recipes for each chapter of her book. In doing so she displays a sloppiness which would have dismayed her subject, flouting his instructions (‘I cheated slightly’), or finding herself too lazy to source the correct ingredients (‘in the end I didn’t bother with it’). She substitutes pickled beetroot for fresh, or sunflower oil for dripping, then complains the resulting soup is tasteless.

Soyer has a message for her in the final words of A Modern Housewife (1851): ‘The pleasures of the table require more attention bestowed on them than is done at the present day.’

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in