Michael Beloff

Some moaning at the Bar

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

But did the author’s own pupilmaster really never say more than five words to him a day — ‘Morning’ (sometimes), ‘Lunch’ (always), ‘I’m off home’ (ditto)? Could the Beadle in Temple Hall actually have refused to allow him to escape to the loo before coffee was served? Was his fellow pupil seriously pressed into service as a sunshade for a computer screen?

The dust jacket carries an endorsement from John Mortimer, but even in Rumpole’s Equity Court chambers the culture here described would seem archaic. My Brief Career reads more like something by Henry Cecil out of Edgar Allen Poe.

The theory of pupillage is that you learn by example: you observe the trials, you spot the errors. Pupilmasters (or increasingly pupilmistresses) are both mentors and exemplars. But the author learned little and liked less. The Bar is nowadays vastly oversubscribed, and it is not fanciful to see the Bar Council doing a deal with him, and republishing his minimalist memoir as a booklet designed to deter all but the most dedicated from even putting their feet on the bottom rung of the ladder.

There isn’t even a happy ending. Mount, dapper, handsome alumnus of Eton and Oxford, loses out in mano a mano competition for the sole tenancy on offer in his set at the end of the year to Silas (rechristened, apparently, ‘Wart’ by his own pupilmaster), short, nerdish, a product of state school and redbrick university education. It was a contest that he openly expected and secretly, I suspect, hoped to lose. Now one of Fleet Street’s (or more accurately Canary Wharf’s) bright young things, after several false starts (he tried investment banking too but has not spun a yarn of his time among the porkbelly futures at any rate yet), he has found his niche. He is a gifted writer; would he have made a successful barrister? Maybe, for is it not part of an advocate’s art to be able to make something out of very little? That is a talent that the author certainly has.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in