Sustainable

• Text settings

  Text size

  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large

  Line Spacing

  • Compact
  • Normal
  • Spacious
• Comments
• Share

  Share

  Dot Wordsworth

  Sustainable

  Copy link

  • Linkedin
  • Messenger
  • Email

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

• Weekly delivery of the magazine
• Unlimited access to our website and app
• Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
• Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Most popular

Alexander Larman

What happened to the Rishi Sunak I knew at school?

Yet when David Cameron and his disciples speak of a ‘presumption in favour of sustainable development’ they do not, I hope, mean that we must presume housing is something we must endure, a lasting blot on the landscape. What they do mean is by no means clear.

Sustainable development is a hooray term. Unsustainable development is not so much development that you can’t bear any longer, but development that runs down like a battery-driven rabbit, or poisons everything around it. Whether the development must be sustainable for ever is a different question.

Someone much to blame for visiting upon us the term sustainable development is Gro Harlem Brundtland, three times prime minister of Norway. The commission she chaired was asked by the UN in 1983 ‘to propose long-term environmental strategies for achieving sustainable development to the year 2000 and beyond’. In 1987, its report, under the inspiring title Our Common Future, declared that sustainable development means ‘meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’. That might imply having your cake without eating it, or possibly cutting off your nose to save anyone else the trouble in future.

To an ecologist sustainable development means that a city should ‘include green wedges, corridors, stepping stones and pockets’ for plants and beasts to find a niche in, as someone suggested in the journal of the Town and Country Planning Association in 1998. To politicians for the past 50 years, sustainable growth has meant ‘a rise in per-capita real income or per capita real gross national product that is capable of continuing for a long time’ — so, no more boom and bust. If they had achieved that, Veronica and her generation wouldn’t be wondering how to buy somewhere to live.