Laurie Graham

The infantilism of Advent calendars for grown-ups

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

How about some slime? Twenty-four little tubs of it, for hours of creative Advent fun and, perhaps, stress relief. Speaking of which, the Best Sex of Your Life Advent calendar promises 24 sex toys to spice up December, although you do have to supply your own batteries.

The one that has really caught my eye this year is the pork scratchings Advent calendar, also available as a twin-pack so you don’t have to share. Because, as we wait for the light and hope of Christmas, what could be uglier than a family member helping themselves to your fave bag of scratchings?

Of course, theologically we’re on thin ice with those pork products, as was Greggs, the bakery chain, with its sausage roll in a manger a couple of years ago, Mary and Joseph having presumably been observant Jews an’ all. But I understand the word Advent is now merely a marketing wheeze and I’m just whistling Dixie. Heaven’s sakes, there are now eight-day Hanukkah ‘advent’ calendars, coming soon to a John Lewis near you. Let no bandwagon be too doctrinaire to jump on. Or too stupid.

Which brings me to dogs. Pet Advent calendars are now an established thing. I presume cats regard them with the disdain they deserve, and I can see that hamsters might enjoy recycling the cardboard packing, but dogs? Advent is about waiting, something taught in puppy-training classes and then, like school trigonometry, promptly forgotten. What self-respecting dog is going to hang about for Baby Jesus when, with a bit of cunning, he can snarf down all 24 treats at one sitting without them touching the sides?

The toothpaste is out of the tube. I accept there is no going back. I do wonder, though, if the word Advent could be reclaimed, ring-fenced with a kind of appellation d’origine contrôlée, like champagne or Stilton. As in: by all means indulge yourself with 24 festive marshmallow surprises if that’s what floats your December boat, but call it an Advent calendar at your peril.

What is wrong with us that the year now has to be one long circus? Halloween elides into Christmas which elides into Easter, but with intervening comfort stops for Mother’s Day, Father’s Day and Black Friday. How beguiled we are by the word ‘treat’. Because you’re worth it, the adverts whisper. There is no downtime. And if we grown-ups can’t bear to wait for anything empty-handed, what chance is there for our children?

I have saved the most egregious till last, although this is an endlessly shifting market and readers with sharper eyes than mine may have spotted something worse. I refer to the Belgian chocolate vulvas Advent calendar, white, dark and milk. I research these things so that you don’t have to.

Times change, certainly. It’s been a grim year and some of us may need an incentive to get out of bed on dark December mornings. I’m no Puritan and I’m partial to pork scratchings myself. I ask only that we pause to consider whether a treat a day, be it booze or food or socks, is worthy of the label Advent.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in