William Shawcross

The Queen’s dedication to service was learnt at her father’s knee

She first addressed the nation aged 14 – making her lifetime of devotion no exaggeration, says Robert Hardman

Princess Elizabeth, with Princess Margaret, broadcasting in 1940. [Getty Images]

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Hardman has read the diaries of her grandfather King George V, who was not kind to his own children but fell completely in love with ‘Lilibet’. He details her deep affection for her father, the unexpected, modest King George VI, from whom she learned that monarchy means service.

She and her sister Margaret spent the war at Windsor Castle. Her father made her colonel of the Grenadier Guards, who were on duty at the castle, just before her 16th birthday. She immediately began the habit of writing to the mothers of soldiers who had been stationed there and then been killed in action. Hardman shows how that simple sense of caring, informed by her Christian sense of duty, has been constant throughout her life.

She has met 14 American presidents since Truman, a feat which probably no American could claim. George W. Bush probably knew her longest because he met her first during his father’s presidency. Like others, he believed that her faith was crucial to her: ‘It keeps life in perspective. She may be the monarch, but she’s not the ultimate monarch, which is interesting.’

Hardman reminds us that the Queen limits her public interventions, knowing that it is her continuing quiet presence, her emblematic role, that really matters. She did address the country two weeks after the first Covid lockdown began. She spoke from Windsor, reminding viewers that she had first broadcast from there as a 14-year-old to the children of the nation. As Hardman notes: ‘Many of those same children were now among the pensioners most at risk’ from Covid. Without being sentimental, she expressed her love of her country and noted: ‘The pride in who we are is not part of our past, it defines our present and our future.’ She concluded by quoting Vera Lynn’s much loved wartime ballad of hope: ‘We’ll meet again.’

A friend asked me recently how it is that Britain has avoided the bloody revolutions or dictatorships that have scarred so many other European nations. One answer was provided by the French philosopher Simone Weil, who died in England, representing the Free French, in 1943. She thought our constitutional monarchy – the fact that the most influential person in the nation was without power – had preserved our traditions of liberty, while countries such as Germany and France who had lost their monarchs had also periodically lost their freedom. I am sure she was and remains right.

The Queen’s constancy throughout 70 years of social change (if not turmoil) has been vital to preserving a sense of national continuity and stability. She represents values – faith, hope and charity – which millions of Britons feel, even if they are too rarely acclaimed nowadays. Queen of Our Times shows why her extraordinary lifetime of service should be celebrated, honoured and cherished.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in