Edward Norman

The saviour of the world

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

The problem the reader encounters is not in unravelling the polemical writing from the analysis of Islam, but in understanding Küng’s own prose. Like many theologians he employs opaque categories which remain opaque — a condition he refers to as ‘the joy of intellectual discourse’. Having observed, for example, that Islamic history has ‘macroparadigms, or epoch-making overall constellations,’ he develops the idea that



paradigm analysis makes it possible to work out the great historical structures and transformations: by concentrating at the same time on the fundamental constants in the decisive variables.

Not all the writing is suffused with this species of intellectual conceit, which in some measure may have been unintentionally augmented in translation, but at certain points the reader begins to suspect that he may have a new Lord Acton on his hands. Küng’s Germanic precision, his emphatic insistence on portentous certainties, and his windbag rhetorical style, are comparable with Acton’s, who, in his day, also fell under censure in Rome. Küng, however, is no professional historian, which becomes clear when he cites as his authority ‘the British historian C. Northcote Parkinson’. He is, as he puts it in one of a number of self-descriptions, an ‘ecumenical theologian’.

He is also known as a theologian who has had his licence removed by the Catholic Church, and the reader will encounter many evidences in this book to explain why. In contrast to ‘the glorious history of Islam’ that of the Catholic Church is represented in a sequence of discreditable episodes — and in searing dismissals of Catholic teaching. ‘Is the Pope truly the spokesman of Christ,’ he asks, ‘if he describes a Crusader expedition as an act of Christian love’? The ‘medieval Roman Catholic hierarchy’ is ‘self-righteous’; the ‘Vatican establishment likes to withhold knowledge from the Catholic laity’; contraception and secular education are to be promoted.

For all these lapses into polemical assertions, however, the historical analysis of Islam could be a useful if prolix introduction for the reader seeking to dispel unnecessary misconceptions. The trouble remains, nevertheless, that Küng’s favoured conclusions are always implicit in the teleology of his writing. Two-thirds of the way through these pages a section entitled ‘The Contemporaneity of Competing Paradigms’ begins, and with it Küng’s ideas about the grand emollient dialogue between the religions of Abraham. Opinions about this will divide along largely political lines. Despite Küng’s disavowal of any ‘utopianism’, however, the conclusion to which he points humanity is not very likely to derive from reasoned discussion but from the very process of secularisation which he advocates. The ‘moderate’ Islam being manufactured by liberals today, and by the British government and the elite of westernised Islamic believers whom they patronise, will eventually join with Christians and Jews who have also drained their religious understanding of traditional doctrinal content, and the result could well be something like Küng’s grand project, and which he calls ‘the transition to a post-modern and post-colonial polycentric paradigm’. To ensure this outcome he helpfully attaches (p. 642) a long special prayer of his own composition. The book itself ends with (an upbeat?) ascription: ‘No survival of our globe without a global ethic, a world ethic, supported by both the religious and the non-religious’. What more could you ask?

Küng threatens a new autobiography next, ‘giving an account of the second half of my life, in which I was exposed to powerful storms, but came through them to reach new shores and wide open spaces’. This study of Islam may perhaps be recognised as a kind of payment on account. You get quite a lot for your money: the table of contents, at the start of the book, itself runs to 15 pages. Never mind the quality; feel the width.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in