Charles Moore Charles Moore

The Spectator’s Notes | 7 June 2008

Charles Moore's reflections on the week

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

TV Licensing (continued). As I have reported often before, the BBC even tries to tax you when you do not possess a television. I hear from the Master of the Pevensey Marsh Beagles that TV Licensing noticed that the kennels, which are inhabited solely by hounds, did not have a television licence. The threatening letters started to flow. The Master answered some of them, to no avail, and threw others away. Eventually he wrote and said, ‘The hounds do not watch television.’ To his surprise, the letters stopped.

It was a bad omen, when Robin Cook became Tony Blair’s first foreign secretary, that he ordered the removal of the picture in his office. It was an elegant painting of Jung Bahadur Rana, the first Prime Minister of Nepal. Jung Bahadur consolidated the independent kingdom of Nepal and forged a lasting friendship with Britain by coming to our assistance during the Indian Mutiny of 1857. The portrait itself, by Bhaja Machu Chitrakar, is a synthesis of subcontinental exoticism with the oil-painting style used to depict British viceroys in Calcutta which Jung Bahadur much admired. Mixing vanity and homage, he presented it to Queen Victoria. The resulting long friendship between Britain and Nepal has produced many advantages, of which the Gurkhas are the best known. Today, the place is a mess. The monarchy never recovered from the massacre in 2001 by a drunken, disappointed Crown Prince Dipendra, who was being thwarted in his desire to marry a member of the Rana family. He killed his father, the King, his mother, other family members and himself. The King’s brother, Gyanendra, succeeded, and became so unpopular for his dictatorial behaviour that the new Constituent Assembly has just voted to abolish the monarchy, egged on by that old fool Jimmy Carter. The Maoists, although they got only 30 per cent of the vote in an election very poorly supervised by the UN, are now taking power. They have said they will abolish the Gurkhas, though they have now gone quiet on this, perhaps because of the economic damage which would be done. They have tied up with Naxalite (communist) extremists in several Indian states, so India, which has a 400-mile open border with Nepal, is nervous. So is the other big neighbour, China. I do not know whether a more Victorian British foreign policy could have helped save Nepal, but I am sure that Jung Bahadur Rana’s portrait, hung in that room, was a fine emblem of a policy which advances British interests by respecting what is now called ‘diversity’. I may be making this up, but I seem to remember that Mr Cook chose to replace the picture of Jung Bahadur with a mirror.

Woody Allen famously said that a stockbroker is ‘someone who invests your money until it has all gone’. The company that has been performing this role for me has sent us, its customers, a letter from its regional director. It seems to be trying to explain something untoward (‘speculation regarding staff changes… we do respect their decision to leave’), but you never really find out what. There will be a ‘seamless movement to your new Investment Manager’, the letter goes on, ‘who’s [sic] key objective is to ensure that we offer the best service for you going forward… I understand that change can be very unsettling… Finally let me reassure any concerns that you may hear regarding the management of your investments going forward.’ The office ‘will continue with its excellent reputation for personal service and look forward to offering an enhanced range of services than you may not previously have experienced and are tailored to your specific requirements’. What is really remarkable is not that a particular manager is bad with words, but that no one in this large and well-known organisation appears to have read the letter and noticed that it does not make sense. Since the company’s employees cannot write English, I make the assumption that they cannot add up either, and so I shall not be using their services ‘going forward’. Actually, this may be a false assumption (after all, plenty of people who can write English cannot add up), but there is something bewildering about this combination of struggling so hard to keep one’s customers yet writing to them in what might as well be a foreign language.

On the Tube recently, I saw advertisements for mass meetings to hear ‘one of India’s most highly regarded living Saints’. Is there a caste system of living sainthood? Could one be a living saint and yet be lowly regarded?

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in