Already a subscriber? Log in
So the question remains: how serious a work is Lucia? Katie Mitchell, who directs the new production at Covent Garden, sees it as a chance to push her ‘100 per cent feminist’ agenda, and on the Royal Opera website you can see her enlarging on her views about the dynamics of a society that prizes masculine values of vindictive justice and honour above all others, but which is confronted by a determined woman with a mind of her own. This is a conceivable reading of the work, in fact a largely similar one to Loy’s, but it is executed with no more success. In the first place, it drowns in detail, nearly all of it unconnected to getting the main points across. The setting is the early Victorian period, when all males and, in this production, some females wore only black suits, and the designer Vicki Mortimer has divided the stage down the centre, so that while the main action is on one side, plenty of distracting business is being executed on the other, much of it the invention of Mitchell. She is annoyed that Donizetti and his librettist Cammarano didn’t provide a scene in which Lucia kills her husband on their wedding night, so she makes up for it by inventing one herself, while on the other half of the stage Donizetti’s opera proceeds.
Controversy raged before the opening night about violence and rape and the usual current operatic agenda, but in the event things were tame. During the beautiful love duet between Lucia and Edgardo they undress one another, or more precisely she removes his shirt and he removes her trousers, and they rock gently but hardly move towards the climax that must have occurred, since in the next scene Lucia throws up copiously from morning sickness. On her wedding night she and her companion Alisa prepare to kill her husband, inflicting on him a prolonged death, which leads to throes of Pythonesque proportions, and also to an agonised miscarriage for Lucia, hence the huge quantity of blood that leaks on to her nightgown for the rest of her time (oddly, as usual with this kind of production, none of this is relayed in the programme book’s synopsis, which only prepares one for a traditional straightforward production).
So, supposing you turned up and closed your eyes most of the time, how would you find it? First, the conducting of Daniel Oren is so routine and inflexible that there must be a hundred timekeepers nearer home who could have done just as well, even imparting a little rubato to the score. Diana Damrau is Lucia, and acts with intensity and conviction. The same can be said of her singing, except that her voice is no longer wholly obedient, and is at most two-thirds the size it needs to be. She couldn’t contribute to the sextet in the thrilling way Lucia should. Hard to know whether some of the sounds she made in the moderately extended mad scene, accompanied by glass harmonica, were intentional: they were certainly eerie, and here her acting was especially convincing.
The men are all excellent, with Charles Castronovo outstanding as Edgardo. He survived having his shirt removed as few tenors could, and sang with power and pathos; however much Mitchell might wish otherwise, the final scene, with Edgardo bitter, then desperate, at the thought of Lucia’s marriage, is the most effective music in the whole score, more moving than any of Lucia’s mad vocal wanderings. One forgives him for putting the worst construction on the situation he finds when he bursts into the wedding scene; all operatic characters assume the worst, otherwise things might turn out well.
Because you read about opera
Also by Michael Tanner
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in