Sebastian Payne

Tube strike shows how Bob Crow is losing his power

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

There is a danger for Comrade Bob that these striking tactics are becoming irrelevant. The Pathé newsreel above from a 1962 strike shows that industrial action back then would have closed the whole network. As Boris Johnson put to the RMT leader on his radio show this morning, Bob is more interested in flexing muscles and making a public point instead of doing what is best for Londoners and most of his members — the RMT ballot had a 40 per cent turnout:

‘’This is really about muscle-flexing and power. The RMT know they have absolutely no chance of stopping this. It is inevitable. But what they need to do is to show to their members, and their future possible members, that London Underground can’t make changes without this kind of industrial action.

‘I can’t sit down and negotiate with you, let alone on air, when you are holding a gun to Londoners’ heads and threatening disruption to the greatest city on earth.’

Given all the fuss, the proposals themselves are rather tame. 750 ticket office jobs are to be made redundant, but TfL stresses there will be a job for everyone who is willing to be flexible. There are no plans for any compulsory redundancies. Boris said today that a thousand people have showed interest in taking voluntary redundancy whilst TfL said they’ve had 450 formal applications so far. In their own words, ‘there shouldn’t be any problems’, were it not for the bolshy unions.

The fact that TfL isn’t asking anyone to leave, simply to be flexible, is what makes this strike so baffling. By resisting such calls, the unions are ultimately damaging the workers they are paid to represent. Trade unions who work with employers, such as Unite at the Ellesmere Port car plant, are more likely to save their workforces through the very flexibility Crow is refusing to contemplate. So if you're not even causing that much chaos, or helping your members in the long-term, what's the point, Bob?

See also: Sorry RMT, there’s no proof the public support the Tube strikes

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in