Lloyd Evans
Already a subscriber? Log in
It’s clear that Shawn has dispensed with two key dramatic instruments here: purpose and conflict. His characters have nothing to gain or lose from each other. And they have no aims to fulfil either. At the first read-through it should have been clear that this wasn’t a play but a collection of words arranged on numbered pages so as to resemble a play. But wait. Something else is going on. The characters at the Talk House refer to ‘Ackerley’, who appears to be a leader elected every three months. Has a state of emergency been declared? There are hints of violence. ‘Targetings’ are mentioned. As are ‘murders’. The characters seem anxious that the state is involved in a campaign of secret assassinations. But not that anxious. Just a bit. One of the actresses reveals that her career has nosedived and she now scrimps a living in a restaurant but she tops up her income by flying around the world to bump off foreigners. No really. That’s in the play. The government arranges for its enemies overseas to be hunted down and killed by waitresses.
At this point something new emerges from the muddle. Shawn hasn’t just created a script that lacks any dramatic tension or focus (or, incidentally, a central character), he wants to lay on a shotgun wedding between two incompatible genres. One is a self-involved navel-gazer about the acting trade. The second is a futuristic political dystopia examining the compromises forced on liberal society by terrorism. Watching this swirl of twaddle is like witnessing a drunk trying to set fire to an ice cube. How did it happen? Most theatres have a professional filter, a ‘literary manager’, who ensures that duds are rejected on arrival. If the NT is reluctant to advertise the vacancy perhaps this column can help initiate the search. Applications should be sent to a chap called Rufus Norris.
Also at the NT, a challenging play by one of the great theatrical personalities of the 20th century. Harley Granville-Barker was an innovative actor and writer who created a handful of enduring plays. Waste, alas, is not one of them. The main character, Henry Trebell, is an icily ambitious politician who has a dalliance with a dippy flapper named Amy. The affair leads to a pregnancy. Amy wants to abort the child. Henry is keen to protect his public reputation. The early scenes are excellent fun. Charles Edwards, a natural comic, brings some lightness to Henry’s calculating selfishness and Olivia Williams plays the maddening Amy as a sexy drifter unburdened by too many brain cells. But once the affair cools off so does our interest. The couple are too ill matched to catch our sympathy. Dimwit Amy is deeply frustrated by life while callous Henry is pursuing his career with laser-beam concentration.
When the play was written, in 1907, abortion was so shameful and sordid a crime that it was never spoken of in public. This gave the play a titillating veneer of novelty and transgression. Not so today. And Hildegard Bechtler’s design is deeply weird. The costumes and hairstyles belong to the right era but the stage floor has been soaked in black glossy paint like a slick of tar. It looks dangerously skiddy. The rooms are bounded by huge flats, in whites and creams, that trundle on and off stage. They’re like enormous rectangles of sliced bread. It’s quite a challenge, this show, but if you fancy three hours of moral tribulation performed inside a giant Hovis loaf sitting on an oil spillage then you’re in luck.
Because you read about national theatre
Also by Lloyd Evans
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in