Interconnect

Your problems solved | 7 July 2007

Dear Mary

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

A. Many well-organised parents consign the mountains of paperwork that come in from their children’s schools to lever-arch filing systems. No one in the school office would be surprised, therefore, if you were to return the form with the contents of the age box simply punched out by a ‘carelessly’ applied hole-puncher. In this way you can sidestep your difficulty.

Q. I am the organist in our small village church and am frequently approached by neighbouring church wardens and vicars as to whether I am willing to deputise in their church. I would appreciate your help in wording my enquiry as to the size of their organ without causing an embarrassed silence or a raised eyebrow.

Name and address withheld

A. The conductor and director of music at Tonbridge School, Hilary Davan Wetton, advises you that, ‘Since the organ is very much a hands-on instrument perhaps it would be better to discuss the number of manuals, pipes or stops, rather than making any direct reference to size.’

Q. I have just attended the fashionable River Cafe quiz in aid of a worthy charity. Most of the contestants were from the very top echelons of the intelligentsia. Although I have always prided myself on knowing things like the name of the second-longest river in the world, I was quite out of my depth at this event. My fellow team-members were able to snap out the answers almost before I had finished listening to the questions. In the unlikely event that I will be asked again, what facial expression should I wear as I am roundly humiliated?

C.B., Broadtown, Wilts

A. Do not make the mistake of assuming a bored expression, as though too grand to answer such easy questions. No one was taken in when one well-known lawyer tried this tactic. Instead assume a David Dimbleby persona. Wield a pen and pad and, as each question is posed, gesture around the table for answers from the member most likely to know it. Act as scribe by collating answers and keeping a running total of points scored. By performing this service the others will hardly notice you have not answered anything yourself. They will not even wonder whether you knew any answers. They will just be grateful that you took an impartial standpoint and were happy to perform the useful role of orchestrating the proceedings.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in